16 Analyse the disadvantages of laissez-faire leadership style. [6]

[Sir Afzal Shad]

Q16 Analyse the disadvantages of laissez-faire leadership style. [6]

---
Possible Structure
[KN]
[AN]
[AN+]

[KN]
[AN]
[AN+]

[Syed Mustafa Ali]

[KN] Lack of structure and guidance.
[AN] Laissez-faire leadership's minimal direction can lead to a lack of clear structure.
[AN+] This causes uncertainty, decreased productivity, and difficulty aligning efforts with organizational goals.

[KN] Potential for coordination issues
[AN] Laissez-faire leadership's hands-off approach may cause coordination and communication challenges.
[AN+] leading to isolated team members, inefficient work, duplicated efforts, and difficulties achieving collective goals.

[Syed Raza]

[KN] Lack of direction and guidance
[AN] employees are not sure what they are supposed to do or how to do it and no clear instructions are given
[AN+] this can cause decreased productivity and waste of time and delays in business achieving their targets

[KN] Ineffective communication and teamwork
[AN] Employees may misunderstand each other's instructions or expectations, which can lead to conflicts also employees who feel like they are not being heard or valued are likely to have low morale and motivation.
[AN+] Ineffective communication and teamwork can lead to a decrease in productivity. Employees who are not communicating effectively or working together well are likely to waste time and resources.

[Farzan Siddiqui]

[KN] Lack of structure and guidance.
[AN] Laissez-faire leadership's can lead to a lack of clear structure.
[AN+] This result in decreasing the productivity.

[KN] Potential for coordination issues
[AN] Laissez-faire leadership's might cause coordination and communication difficulties.
[AN+] This leads towards difficulties in achieving the goals for team members.

[khadija nasir]

[kn] unclear tasks assigned
[an] duties are not clearly stated, employees are not given the proper direction of work leading to coonfusion
[an+] inefficient time management and hence unnecessary wastage of resources

[kn] inadequate sense of responsibility and authority
[an] managers usually do not take accountability for their actions and employees tend to abuse their power by working halfheartedly and unethically
[an+] leads to a negative impact on the company's brand image and overall performance

[Shaliza khawaja]

(kn) chances of ignoring error
(an) as employees are allowed to take decision without approval this might decrease quality as mistakes overlooked
(an+) as quality is decrease this would upset the customer and even put them off
(kn)conflicts may raise
(an)as random people would be taking up different roles and responsibilities so nobody would know there duty
(an+) hence cause miscommunication and mistrust

[khuram khan]

[KN] Lack of Structure and Guidance
[AN] Laissez-faire leaders provide minimal structure and guidance, which may lead to confusion and uncertainty among team members.
[AN+] Without clear direction, projects may lack coordination, and team members may struggle to understand their roles and responsibilities.

[KN] Potential for Poor Decision-Making
[AN] The absence of strong leadership guidance may result in poor decision-making by team members.
[AN+] Poor decisions can lead to inefficiencies, errors, or misaligned efforts, negatively affecting the business's outcomes and might result in the brand reputation getting ruined.

[Talha Asim]

(Kn) lack of accountability and direction (an) it will cause confusion among team members due to lack of guidance (an+) this will lead no ineffectiveness even if efficiency is present

(Kn) possibility of errors (an) since team members are not mainly hired for leadership but rather conducting their own tasks, lack of leadership can result in wrong decisions or work being followed (an+) this will further result in time wastage as even the making of a settled decision would take time

[Ibrahim Aamir]

[KN]Communication Gaps as less communication from the leader
[AN] Not enough communication from the leader can mess up how things are coordinated, create misunderstandings, and make the business less efficient overall.
[AN+] This can lead to confusion, errors, and a less effective business operation.

[KN] employees may take advantage of the lack of supervision.
[AN] If employees take advantage of not being supervised enough, it can make the work go slower, cause problems, and hurt the business overall.
[AN+] This can lead to lower productivity, conflicts among employees, and negatively affect the overall success of the business.

[Hadia Zia]

[KN] Lack of direction.
[AN] W/o clear guidance and effective management, confusion may arise about roles and responsibilities..
[AN+] Hence will lead to missed deadlines, inefficiency and decline in performance standards.

[KN] Increase in conflicts.
[AN] Lack of coordination may arise too which may create disputes among the employees hence leading to toxic work environment.
[AN+] Thus it may hinder team work hence further resulting in an decrease in overall performance of the organization.

[Mahnoor Nadeem]

[KN]: Miss-use of authority
[AN]: Since workers would be answerable to anyone they would be lazy and waste time
[AN]: Causing a fall in output and efficiency

[KN]: Lack of guidance
[AN]: If employees are unclear about their tasks it will increase possibilities for mistakes hurting the image of the business
[AN]: Increasing production cost and decreasing revenue

[hafsa kashif]

[kn] lack of structure or guidance
[an] in such leaderships employees are to find different ways of completing tasks themselves which may be difficult without any sort of leader on top as conflicts and arguments do occur
[an+] thus causing inefficient decision making leading to more time wasted and less output
[kn] potential for coordination issues
[an] as employees don't have any main goal and are to make decisions themselves, they will have communication challenges
[n+] leading to inefficient teamwork, duplicated efforts, and difficulty in achieving collective goals

[Kumail Alvi]

[KN] Risk of Poor Quality and Productivity.
[AN] The risk is that standards of productivity and quality could deteriorate in the absence of proactive leadership.
[AN+] The team's or organization's overall efficiency may suffer from a lack of focus on goals as a result of unclear direction and supervision.

[KN] Accountability Issues.
[AN] Establishing definite lines of accountability can be difficult in a leadership style that values laissez-faire.
[AN+] There's a chance that team members will share accountability if a leader doesn't take accountability for results, which could result in a lack of commitment and ownership.